The Mormons continued to practice polygamy despite these laws, since they believed that the practice were protected by the freedom of religion clause in the Bill of Rights. To test the constitutionality of the laws, George Reynolds, Brigham Young's private secretary, agreed to be tried. In 1879 the case reached the Supreme Court, which upheld the Morrill Act: "Laws are made for the government of actions, and while they cannot interfere with mere religious belief and opinion, they may with practices."
In 1882 Congress passed the Edmunds Act, which was actually a series of amendments to the Morrill Act. It restated that polygamy was a felony punishable by five years of imprisonment and a $500 fine. Unlawful cohabitation, which was easier to establish because the prosecution had to prove only that the couple had lived together rather than that a marriage ceremony had taken place, remained a misdemeanor punishable by six months imprisonment and a $300 fine. Convicted polygamists were disenfranchised and were ineligible to hold political office. Those who practiced polygamy were disqualified from jury service, and those who professed a belief in it could not serve in a polygamy case. All registration and election officers in Utah Territory were dismissed, and a board of five commissioners was appointed to direct elections.
- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (8)
The laws of the government supersede those of the church.
If they didn't polygamy or plural marriage would still be considered legal in America
In the grand scheme of things what people believe based upon their religion about birth control or abortion is not important.
Fed Up
Good points
And a question --
As the country moves (rightfully) to a legal position that marriage is a union between a man and a woman, a man and a man, a woman and a woman will an an extrapolation of that change in settled law open up the possibility that marriage can also be between a man and a few women or a few women and a man, or a few men, or a few women???
Something to think about
From the article
"Laws are made for the government of actions, and while they cannot interfere with mere religious belief and opinion, they may with practices."
Fed Up
And that is the answer to some question, but not to the one I posed in #2
Care to comment on the extrapolation
I don't have a problem with any one marrying anyone or as many any ones as they want.
Polygamy to me minimizes adultery and out of wedlock children as well as brings the other woman out of the shadows.
Hi ya Robert
Saying I don't have a problem with something is not the same as being for something.
If one man wants two women and the women don't have a problem sharing the man then who am I to oppose them marrying each other and making a life for themselves.
If two women love each other and enjoy being with each other and want to make a life for themselves,then who am I to stand in their way.
I know that I am not GOD, the sad thing is most Republicans don't know or realize that they aren't GOD.
Fed Up
I have no problem with your views on the subject
Live and let live is how I look at it
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |



